Guy Fawkes was born in in Stonegate, York. His father died when he was only eight years old.
Print this page Introduction As history actually turned out, there are two very good reasons why the Gunpowder Plot had to fail. The first was that the plotters were caught in the double-bind of most early modern conspirators: That is exactly what happened; one of the people brought into the plot in its later stages probably the unstable Francis Tresham told an opportunist peer, Lord Monteagle, who tipped off the government.
The other reason why the plot was a guaranteed failure was simply that the powder would not have blown. If Guy had plunged in the torch with Parliament all ready above him, all that would have happened would have been a damp splutter.
From Henry VIII to Winston Churchill, find out about Britain's history with BBC programmes, timelines and games. Gulliver's Travels: Theme Analysis, Free Study Guides and book notes including comprehensive chapter analysis, complete summary analysis, author biography information, character profiles, theme analysis, metaphor analysis, and top ten quotes on classic literature. Here are some interesting facts about Guy Fawkes and his involvement in The Gunpowder Plot – the failed attempt to blow up The House of Lords during the State Opening of .
Both these fatal weaknesses were contingent, however, on one accident of history; the postponement of Parliament. It had originally been scheduled to meet on 3 Octoberand only the lingering traces of bubonic plague in London made it seem sensible to put off the occasion for a month.
Let us suppose that this one variable had been removed, and there had been no plague in the capital that summer. Parliament would have met a month before, very probably when the gunpowder stored in the cellar since July was still lethally effective, and arguably before one of the less discreet plotters had lost nerve enough to talk to Monteagle.
We are thus in a real position to suppose that in OctoberKing James, Queen Anne, and both Houses of Parliament would indeed have gone sky-high together, leaving the Catholic conspirators ready to seize the kingdom.
What would have happened then? The plan of the plotters was that while Guy was blowing up Parliament, most of the others would be making for the Midlands, to seize the dead king's elder daughter Elizabeth, from her residence in Warwickshire, and start an armed rebellion there which would spread out to take over the country.
The king's elder son, Henry, would have died with his parents, and the younger one, Charles, was to be taken prisoner at London before the conspirators pulled out, and then brought up to the Midlands to join his sister.
What is really significant about the results is not that the explosion did not go off, nor that the plotters could not find Charles to capture him before riding north, but that when they reached the central counties they behaved as though the whole scheme had worked, announcing to their friends there that the the king was dead.
Despite this lie, very few recruits joined them and the project of taking Elizabeth had to be called off.
The small armed band that they did pull together was hunted down by Protestant vigilantes led by local officials, and were then killed or captured. It is unlikely that things would have been very different had the explosion occurred, even had the conspirators captured the royal children.
For obvious security reasons most of the small English Catholic community had not been informed of the plot, and one important member who had heard about it by accident, Henry Garnet the leader of the English Jesuits, had been horrified and ordered the plotters to desist.
As news spread of the mass-murder at Westminster and the rebellion in the Midlands, the rest of the English Catholics would have been caught by surprise, and felt appalled by the scale of the crime. They would have been in no physical or emotional position to support the rebels, and they would have been surrounded by Protestants who were hearing of the atrocity in the capital and the uprising, aware that Catholics were responsible for both, and left under the command of their surviving local leaders.
Almost certainly these would have taken up arms in a panic, turned upon the Catholics in their respective areas, and imprisoned or slaughtered them, in an English equivalent to the wave of hate and fear that had driven the French Catholics to massacre the Protestants there on St Bartholomew's Day in Protestant militia and vigilantes would have converged on the rebels in the Midlands and overwhelmed them.
It is unlikely that the conspirators would have murdered the royal children when surrounded. Their actual conduct when brought to bay was that of a high-minded resignation to martyrdom.
The Catholic powers of Europe would have protested at the slaughter inflicted upon their co-religionists, but the murder of the king, queen and peerage would have done much to excuse it in the eyes of foreign states. Charles I would have become king at the age of four instead of twenty-four.
He would never have had the difficult relationship with his parents that left him determined to abandon most of his father's policies, and never have made a friendship with his father's unpopular favourite, Buckingham, so tarnishing the opening of his own reign. As a godly Protestant prince, with all the serious and devout nature of the real Charles, he would have been assured of considerable support in Britain.An Annotation of Literary, Historic, and Artistic References in Alan Moore's Graphic Novel, V For Vendetta.
Madelyn Boudreaux, April 27, Last Revised. August. King Lear: BBC Dramatization (BBC Radio Presents) [William Shakespeare, Sir John Gielgud, Dramatization] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
A king foolishly divides his kingdom between his scheming two oldest daughters and estranges himself from the daughter who loves him. So begins this profoundly moving and disturbing tragedy that. From Henry VIII to Winston Churchill, find out about Britain's history with BBC programmes, timelines and games.
Dramatic Irony in Macbeth "One of the most effective of dramatic devices is the use of "irony." The essential idea of "irony" is double dealing, as when some speech has a double meaning -- the obvious one which all perceive -- and the cryptic which only certain of the hearers understand.
The Gunpowder Plot The Gunpowder Plot of was a result of the inconsistent policies of King James I toward English Catholics. An attempt to increase toleration for, if not completely convert England back to the Catholic faith, the Gunpowder Plo. + free ebooks online. Did you know that you can help us produce ebooks by proof-reading just one page a day?
Go to: Distributed Proofreaders.